About five years ago the European Court of Justice (ECJ) stated in an infringement proceeding against Germany (ECJ November 22, 2012 – C-600/10, OJ 2013 C 26/3) that the European Commission could not prove a violation of EU law caused by the final withholding tax levied on German dividends received by foreign pension funds.
Recently the Fiscal Court of Munich again referred said question to the European Court of Justice (FG München October23, 2017 – 7 K 1435/15). In this beinformed we explain why in our opinion this time a ruling approving that the final withholding tax in fact infringes the principle of the free movement of capital (Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) is highly likely.
Shortly after the French anti-abuse rule for the Parent-Subsidiary-Directive was declared void because it was contrary to European law, the German rule is next. In the joined cases C-504/16 (Deister Holding) and C-613/16 (Juhler Holding), the European Court of Justice decided that the anti-abuse rule of Section 50d (3) German Income Tax Act in the version of 2007 violates both the Parent-Subsidiary-Directive and the freedom of establishment. Even though the judgement is only applicable for cases until the assessment year 2011, there are substantial doubts that the new version which is valid since 2012 is in line with European law. This question is indeed already on the table of the European Court of Justice (ECJ C-440/17).